Every fight promoter I know is obsessed with the same question: how do we look better on screen?

Better cameras. Better lighting. Better broadcast deal. It's the right question for the top of the food chain. But for everyone else in this sport, I think it's the wrong thing to optimize for right now.

The right question is: why would someone leave their house to be in the room?

Something is happening outside of combat sports that most people in this industry aren't paying attention to. Padel clubs are exploding across the US and Europe. Pickleball went from a joke to a venture-backed industry. Run clubs are the new social scene in every major city. Searches for social clubs and group experiences are at all-time highs.

And the reason is simple. Social media is flooded. Half the content people scroll past now was made by AI. It's getting harder to tell what's real and who's actually on the other side of the screen. People aren't articulating this consciously. They're just spending less time online and more time looking for things that feel real.

Shared, in-person, can't-be-faked experience.

Now think about what delivers that at the highest intensity. Not a run club. Not a padel match. Those are social. They're fun. They work.

But nothing in the experience economy competes with a live fight.

I was always a sucker for this. Because I think the idea is simple. If the people in the room are having the time of their lives, that energy transfers to the screen. You don't have to manufacture it in post. You don't have to fake the atmosphere with crowd mics and camera angles. If the experience is real, the content takes care of itself.

Made this happen at the first private event at Dirty Boxing. Invite-only. Small room. Every detail designed around what the audience would feel, not just what the camera would see. The energy in the room that night was something that events ten times the size, with ten times the budget, could only dream of. And when the footage came out, people could feel it through the screen.

Most promotions do it the other way around. They copy the UFC's broadcast template — same camera setup, same graphics package, same pacing — and hope it translates. It doesn't. Because they're copying the output without building the input. The UFC's broadcast looks the way it does because behind the camera there are 15,000 people losing their minds. Without that energy in the room, you're just filming a fight in a quiet space with good lighting.

This is happening at the same time that more capital is flowing into combat sports than at any point in history. Netflix entering MMA. Scott Coker raising $60 million. The UFC spending $60 million to put a cage on the White House lawn this Sunday. Saudi money still pouring into boxing cards and a new TKO-backed league. The distribution boom is real.

But distribution solves the top of the pyramid. For everyone else — the regional promotions, the mid-tier organizations, the independent shows — the opportunity isn't another streaming deal. It's the live experience itself.

Forty thousand gyms in this country where people train to fight. A social club boom putting millions of people back into physical spaces together. And a sport that delivers the most intense version of exactly what those people are looking for.

The promotions that build for the room will own the screen. Not the other way around.

— Adam

P.S. If you're building in the combat sports space and want to think through the business side, reach out or apply at SKOVAX.CO​

P.P.S. If you're a fighter trying to figure out how to actually get paid in this sport, I put together a framework for exactly that. Get it at getpaidtofight.com​

P.P.P.S. Browse the full newsletter archive HERE.